StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CTH.V$1.52+0.00%
Fair $1.52+0.0%

CTH.V

CoTec Holdings Corp.

Financial Services / Asset ManagementTSXV

$1.52

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.52Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -94.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CTH.VLocal privado en este navegador · CoTec Holdings Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$178M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-94.5%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$2
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

CTH.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.520Periodo -99.5%
Fair value: $1.520

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

472.0%

FCF / Net income

0.30x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $-1.2M · net income $-19.2M · FCF $-5.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

919.0%— pts

Net margin

1570.2%— pts

FCF margin

472.0%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$-1.2M$-1.2M$309000.00——
Net Income$-19.2M$-19.2M$-8.0M$9.8M$1.5M
EBITDA$-16.5M$-16.5M$-7.2M$10.0M$1.5M
EPS-0.23-0.23-0.120.180.05
Operating Margin919.0%919.0%-1362.1%——
Net Margin1570.2%1570.2%-2583.8%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.120.200.080.17
Current Ratio1.461.46———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-5.8M$-5.8M$-2.9M$-4.2M$-1.1M
Returns
ROE-94.5%-94.5%-45.7%31.4%16.1%
Valuation
P/E———3.509.40
EV/EBITDA———3.5611.05
P/B6.306.302.451.111.68
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-494.8%-494.8%———
EPS Growth-91.7%-91.7%-166.7%260.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +90.0%

Total return

+90.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.12 → -0.23

Residual

+90.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+90.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.