StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CUF.AX$0.07-5.48%
Fair $0.07+0.0%

CUF.AX

CuFe Ltd

Basic Materials / Other Industrial Metals & MiningASX

$0.07

-0.00 (-5.48%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.07Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-8.3M · quality 44.7/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -2.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CUF.AXLocal privado en este navegador · CuFe Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$120M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-247.2%

↓

Gross Margin

-3.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

CUF.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.069Periodo -86.2%
Fair value: $0.069

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

5.0%

FCF / Net income

-0.35x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $96.1M · net income $-13.6M · FCF $4.8M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

-3.0%— pts

Operating margin

-16.6%— pts

Net margin

-14.2%— pts

FCF margin

5.0%— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$96.1M$96.1M$35.0M$33.0M—
Net Income$-13.6M$-13.6M$-11.2M$-164915.00$-2.5M
EBITDA$-3.6M$-3.6M$-6.5M$3.0M$-2.6M
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.00—
Gross Margin-3.0%-3.0%-14.8%-4.2%—
Operating Margin-16.6%-16.6%-38.3%-26.2%—
Net Margin-14.2%-14.2%-31.9%-0.5%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.130.06—
Current Ratio5.655.65———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.8M$4.8M$-8.3M$-10.6M$-5.5M
Returns
ROE-247.2%-247.2%-80.8%-0.7%-19.4%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA———4.57—
P/B14.2214.221.190.792.86
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth174.5%174.5%6.1%——
EPS Growth-4.3%-4.3%-5650.0%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +885.7%

Total return

+885.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.01

Residual

+885.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+885.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.