StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CYNL.XC$380.00+96.38%
Fair $380.00+0.0%

CYNL.XC

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc

Financial Services / Asset ManagementCboe UK

$380.00

+186.50 (+96.38%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $380.00Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 4/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 48.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 45/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · CYNL.XCLocal privado en este navegador · CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$138M

P/E

2714.3x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

6.6%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$380
$2$380

TradingView lightweight chart

CYNL.XC price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $380.00Periodo +273.5%
Fair value: $380.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-41.8%

FCF CAGR

+38.9%

FCF margin

37.0%

FCF / Net income

0.43x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $10.6M · net income $9.1M · FCF $3.9M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

86.4%-12.5% pts

FCF margin

37.0%+34.3% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$10.6M$10.6M$6.4M$24.3M$53.7M
Net Income$9.1M$9.1M$5.2M$23.5M$53.1M
EPS0.140.140.080.350.79
Net Margin86.4%86.4%81.3%96.9%98.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.120.120.130.14
Current Ratio0.390.39———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.9M$3.9M$5.3M$2.4M$1.5M
Returns
ROE6.6%6.6%3.8%17.4%46.0%
Valuation
P/E2714.292714.292151.98446.78204.74
P/B183.24183.2482.5377.7594.25
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth64.2%64.2%-73.5%-54.8%—
EPS Growth74.5%74.5%-77.7%-55.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

527.3%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$33.72

Spread vs growth

-452.8%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

212.6%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$40.80

Spread vs growth

-138.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

85.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$65.71

Spread vs growth

-11.0%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +96.4%

Total return

+96.4%

Start / end P/E

2471.3x → 2781.8x

EPS bridge

0.08 → 0.14

Residual

+9.4%

EPS growth+74.5%
Multiple rerating+12.6%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+9.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.