StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
DNG.TO$6.61+5.42%
Fair $6.61+0.0%

DNG.TO

Dynacor Group Inc.

Basic Materials / Other Precious Metals & MiningToronto

$6.61

+0.34 (+5.42%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.61Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 64/B
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.0M · quality 47.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

64/100

B

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · DNG.TOLocal privado en este navegador · Dynacor Group Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$277M

P/E

8.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.1x

↓

ROE

15.8%

↑

Gross Margin

10.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$7
$4$7

TradingView lightweight chart

DNG.TO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6.610Periodo +932.8%
Fair value: $6.610

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+26.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.32x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $397.6M · net income $21.3M · FCF $-6.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

10.9%-1.5% pts

Operating margin

6.7%-2.4% pts

Net margin

5.4%-0.7% pts

FCF margin

-1.7%-3.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$397.6M$397.6M$284.4M$250.2M$197.5M
Net Income$21.3M$21.3M$16.9M$15.1M$12.0M
EBITDA$34.3M$34.3M$30.8M$26.6M$21.5M
EPS——0.450.390.30
Gross Margin10.9%10.9%12.6%12.1%12.4%
Operating Margin6.7%6.7%9.2%8.8%9.1%
Net Margin5.4%5.4%5.9%6.0%6.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.010.010.01
Current Ratio4.284.28———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.9M$-6.9M$11.0M$3.0M$2.6M
Returns
ROE15.8%15.8%17.0%16.8%15.0%
Valuation
P/E8.818.8112.9310.2810.40
EV/EBITDA7.137.136.555.064.61
P/B2.052.052.211.741.54
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth39.8%39.8%13.7%26.6%—
EPS Growth——15.4%30.0%—
Dividend Yield2.4%2.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +41.0%

Total return

+41.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.45 → n/d

Residual

+38.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+38.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.