StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
DTR.AX$0.17-2.86%
Fair $0.17+0.0%

DTR.AX

Dateline Resources Limited

Basic Materials / GoldASX

$0.17

-0.00 (-2.86%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.17Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 17/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-7.7M · quality 65.7/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 34/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

17/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -1.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · DTR.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Dateline Resources Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$650M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-127.1%

↓

Gross Margin

100.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.33

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

DTR.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.170Periodo -93.7%
Fair value: $0.170

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1916.1%

FCF / Net income

0.50x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $308119.0 · net income $-11.7M · FCF $-5.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

100.0%— pts

Operating margin

-2187.3%— pts

Net margin

-3806.6%— pts

FCF margin

-1916.1%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$308119.00$308119.00—$858199.00—
Net Income$-11.7M$-11.7M$-17.2M$-11.1M$-14.4M
EBITDA$-11.4M$-11.4M$-15.8M$-8.2M$-11.5M
EPS-0.00-0.00-0.01-0.02-0.03
Gross Margin100.0%100.0%—100.0%—
Operating Margin-2187.3%-2187.3%—-1858.1%—
Net Margin-3806.6%-3806.6%—-1296.1%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.330.331.551.922.22
Current Ratio9.369.36———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-5.9M$-5.9M$-7.7M$-15.3M$-19.4M
Returns
ROE-127.1%-127.1%-480.7%-100.5%-145.7%
Valuation
P/B45.7945.793.041.504.29
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth66.9%66.9%24.5%42.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +25.9%

Total return

+25.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.00

Residual

+25.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+25.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.