StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ECOB.L$11.75+0.00%
Fair $11.75+0.0%

ECOB.L

Eco Buildings Group plc

Basic Materials / Building MaterialsLSE

$11.75

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $11.75Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 18/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.2M · quality 62.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

18/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -44.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ECOB.LLocal privado en este navegador · Eco Buildings Group plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$17M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-44.3%

↓

Gross Margin

70.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.70

↑
52-Week Range$12
$3$29

TradingView lightweight chart

ECOB.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $12.00Periodo -63.1%
Fair value: $11.75

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-161.0%

FCF / Net income

0.57x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.4M · net income $-3.9M · FCF $-2.2M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

70.2%— pts

Operating margin

-156.7%— pts

Net margin

-281.0%— pts

FCF margin

-161.0%— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$1.4M$1.4M$139552.00——
Net Income$-3.9M$-3.9M$-2.5M$-334513.00—
EBITDA$-3.2M$-3.2M$-2.0M$-242698.00—
EPS-0.05-0.05-0.04-0.03—
Gross Margin70.2%70.2%15.6%——
Operating Margin-156.7%-156.7%-992.7%——
Net Margin-281.0%-281.0%-1820.2%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.700.700.47-5.27—
Current Ratio0.690.69———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.2M$-2.2M$-1.2M$-724909.00—
Returns
ROE-44.3%-44.3%-22.8%100.1%—
Valuation
P/B103.77103.7776.84——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth897.4%897.4%———
EPS Growth-25.0%-25.0%-44.8%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +160.9%

Total return

+160.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.04 → -0.05

Residual

+160.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+160.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.