StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
EQS$1.45-3.97%
Fair $1.45+0.0%

EQS

Equus Total Return, Inc.

Financial Services / Asset ManagementNYSE

$1.45

-0.06 (-3.97%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.45Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 31/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

31/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 6Warnings: 1unknown: 6
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -85.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · EQSLocal privado en este navegador · Equus Total Return, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$20M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-85.5%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.13

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

EQS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.450Periodo -84.2%
Fair value: $1.450

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2020–2025 · 5 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

21.8%

FCF / Net income

0.15x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $-9.8M · net income $-14.2M · FCF $-2.1M

2020-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

144.7%+4368.8% pts

FCF margin

21.8%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Income Statement
Revenue$-9.8M$-9.8M$-14.3M$17.2M$2.5M$0.00$291000.00
Net Income$-14.2M$-14.2M$-18.8M$12.9M$-1.1M$2.6M$-12.3M
EPS-1.03-1.03-1.380.96-0.080.19-0.91
Net Margin144.7%144.7%131.1%75.2%-45.2%—-4224.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.130.13—0.930.17——
Current Ratio0.840.84—————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.1M$-2.1M$38.2M$-51.4M$-7.7M——
Returns
ROE-85.5%-85.5%-63.6%26.8%-3.2%7.1%-36.4%
Valuation
P/E———1.64———
P/B1.201.200.540.440.59——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth31.7%31.7%-183.3%589.1%—-100.0%—
EPS Growth25.4%25.4%-243.8%1300.0%—120.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +33.0%

Total return

+33.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.38 → -1.03

Residual

+33.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+33.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.