StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FA.V$0.05+0.00%
Fair $0.05+0.0%

FA.V

Fountain Asset Corp.

Financial Services / Asset ManagementTSXV

$0.05

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.05Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 4/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · FA.VLocal privado en este navegador · Fountain Asset Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3M

P/E

1.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

0.6x

↓

ROE

25.7%

↑

Gross Margin

94.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

FA.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.050Periodo -66.7%
Fair value: $0.050

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+415.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

44.9%

FCF / Net income

0.90x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.8M · net income $1.9M · FCF $1.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

94.6%+1426.1% pts

Operating margin

50.3%+3546.6% pts

Net margin

49.9%+30420.9% pts

FCF margin

44.9%+5361.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.8M$3.8M$-1.9M$-4.4M$28025.00
Net Income$1.9M$1.9M$-1.3M$-5.3M$-8.5M
EBITDA$1.9M$1.9M$-1.3M$-5.3M$-979846.00
EPS——-0.02-0.09-0.14
Gross Margin94.6%94.6%124.1%109.2%-1331.6%
Operating Margin50.3%50.3%70.7%121.4%-3496.3%
Net Margin49.9%49.9%69.0%120.4%-30371.0%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio9.009.00———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.7M$1.7M$-226834.00$-813525.00$-1.5M
Returns
ROE25.7%25.7%-23.6%-79.0%-71.9%
Valuation
P/E1.671.67———
EV/EBITDA0.550.55———
P/B0.430.430.510.460.73
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth304.4%304.4%56.9%-15694.0%—
EPS Growth——77.8%35.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +42.9%

Total return

+42.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → n/d

Residual

+42.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+42.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.