StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FEML.L$1505.00+1.69%
Fair $1505.00+0.0%

FEML.L

Fidelity Emerging Markets Limited

Financial Services / Asset ManagementLSE

$1505.00

+25.00 (+1.69%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1505.00Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 52/C
F-Score: 4/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 37.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

52/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · FEML.LLocal privado en este navegador · Fidelity Emerging Markets Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$613M

P/E

4.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

16.7%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$1505
$731$1514

TradingView lightweight chart

FEML.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,505Periodo +960.6%
Fair value: $1,505

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-35.6%

FCF CAGR

+79.0%

FCF margin

136.1%

FCF / Net income

1.44x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $133.0M · net income $126.1M · FCF $181.0M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

94.8%-2.5% pts

FCF margin

136.1%+129.8% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$133.0M$133.0M$23.4M$-488.5M$497.4M
Net Income$126.1M$126.1M$14.5M$-497.5M$484.0M
EPS1.451.450.16-4.963.98
Net Margin94.8%94.8%62.1%101.8%97.3%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio5.145.14———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$181.0M$181.0M$14.8M$428.0M$31.5M
Returns
ROE16.7%16.7%1.8%-62.4%28.5%
Valuation
P/E4.104.103580.00—230.65
P/B173.66173.6665.5080.4465.63
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth467.8%467.8%104.8%-198.2%—
EPS Growth806.3%806.3%103.2%-224.6%—
Dividend Yield1.3%1.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

351.6%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$133.54

Spread vs growth

454.7%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

156.7%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$161.59

Spread vs growth

649.6%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

68.0%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$260.24

Spread vs growth

738.2%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +100.2%

Total return

+100.2%

Start / end P/E

4731.3x → 1037.9x

EPS bridge

0.16 → 1.45

Residual

-629.4%

EPS growth+806.3%
Multiple rerating-78.1%
Dividend+1.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-629.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.