StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FINAMEXO.MX$40.75+0.00%
Fair $40.75+0.0%

FINAMEXO.MX

Casa de Bolsa Finamex S.A.B. de C.V.

Financial Services / Capital MarketsMexico

$40.75

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $40.75Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 54/C
F-Score: 5/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 39.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

54/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · FINAMEXO.MXLocal privado en este navegador · Casa de Bolsa Finamex S.A.B. de C.V.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.6B

P/E

5.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

20.4%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$41
$29$41

TradingView lightweight chart

FINAMEXO.MX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $40.75Periodo +2620.0%
Fair value: $40.75

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+30.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-23.5%

FCF / Net income

-0.86x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.69B · net income $464.3M · FCF $-397.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

27.4%+7.8% pts

FCF margin

-23.5%+5.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.69B$1.69B$978.5M$1.00B$759.0M
Net Income$464.3M$464.3M$150.5M$202.0M$149.0M
EPS7.007.002.003.192.35
Net Margin27.4%27.4%15.4%20.2%19.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.030.030.05
Current Ratio0.410.41———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-397.8M$-397.8M$-316.6M$243.0M$-223.0M
Returns
ROE20.4%20.4%7.8%10.8%8.5%
Valuation
P/E5.825.8214.689.0912.77
P/B1.191.191.150.981.09
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth73.1%73.1%-2.2%31.9%—
EPS Growth250.0%250.0%-37.3%35.7%—
Dividend Yield2.9%2.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-19.8%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$3.62

Spread vs growth

269.8%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-9.0%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$4.38

Spread vs growth

259.0%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

0.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$7.05

Spread vs growth

249.9%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +41.7%

Total return

+41.7%

Start / end P/E

14.7x → 5.8x

EPS bridge

2.00 → 7.00

Residual

-150.9%

EPS growth+250.0%
Multiple rerating-60.3%
Dividend+2.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-150.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.