StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FNQ.CN$0.01+0.00%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

FNQ.CN

Fineqia International Inc.

Financial Services / Asset ManagementCanadian Sec

$0.01

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 16/F
F-Score: 3/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 100.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 14/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

16/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 0unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · FNQ.CNLocal privado en este navegador · Fineqia International Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

54.5%

↑

Gross Margin

-11.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

-0.52

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

FNQ.CN price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.005Periodo -96.9%
Fair value: $0.005

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+52.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-212.4%

FCF / Net income

0.59x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $732155.0 · net income $-2.6M · FCF $-1.6M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

-11.9%+404.3% pts

Operating margin

-155.2%+537.2% pts

Net margin

-357.2%-253.1% pts

FCF margin

-212.4%-345.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$732155.00$732155.00$521629.00——$134400.00
Net Income$-2.6M$-2.6M$-2.5M$-3.0M—$-139919.00
EBITDA$-2.6M$-2.6M$-2.5M$-3.0M—$-136725.00
EPS——-0.00-0.00—-0.00
Gross Margin-11.9%-11.9%-101.1%——-416.2%
Operating Margin-155.2%-155.2%-443.9%——-692.5%
Net Margin-357.2%-357.2%-483.4%——-104.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.52-0.52-0.56-1.05-1.03—
Current Ratio0.300.30————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.6M$-1.6M$-1.7M$-2.4M—$178263.00
Returns
ROE54.5%54.5%112.4%153.7%——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth40.4%40.4%————
EPS Growth——22.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.0%

Total return

+0.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.00 → n/d

Residual

+0.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.