StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GARGFUR.BO$116.60+2.24%
Fair $116.60+0.0%

GARGFUR.BO

Garg Furnace Limited

Basic Materials / SteelBSE

$116.60

+2.55 (+2.24%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $116.60Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $17.7M · quality 45.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · GARGFUR.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Garg Furnace Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$584M

P/E

6.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.8x

↓

ROE

12.3%

↑

Gross Margin

14.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$117
$109$266

TradingView lightweight chart

GARGFUR.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $116.60Periodo -56.8%
Fair value: $116.60

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+13.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

0.7%

FCF / Net income

0.23x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.62B · net income $76.4M · FCF $17.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

14.8%+9.7% pts

Operating margin

2.3%-1.2% pts

Net margin

2.9%-0.6% pts

FCF margin

0.7%+1.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.62B$2.62B$2.58B$2.38B$1.79B
Net Income$76.4M$76.4M$55.6M$59.4M$63.2M
EBITDA$93.9M$93.9M$73.1M$75.1M$78.8M
EPS14.1614.1611.6014.8215.77
Gross Margin14.8%14.8%13.1%4.3%5.0%
Operating Margin2.3%2.3%1.7%2.6%3.5%
Net Margin2.9%2.9%2.2%2.5%3.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.030.230.70
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$17.7M$17.7M$-140.7M$61.4M$-16.3M
Returns
ROE12.3%12.3%11.4%28.7%42.9%
Valuation
P/E6.116.11———
EV/EBITDA5.785.78———
P/B1.011.01———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.4%1.4%8.3%33.4%—
EPS Growth22.1%22.1%-21.7%-6.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-9.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$10.35

Spread vs growth

32.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-2.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$12.52

Spread vs growth

24.5%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

3.6%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$20.16

Spread vs growth

18.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -39.4%

Total return

-39.4%

Start / end P/E

16.6x → 8.2x

EPS bridge

11.60 → 14.16

Residual

-11.1%

EPS growth+22.1%
Multiple rerating-50.4%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-11.1%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.