StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GRA.TO$1.97-1.99%
Fair $1.97+0.0%

GRA.TO

NanoXplore Inc.

Basic Materials / ChemicalsToronto

$1.97

-0.04 (-1.99%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.97Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 6/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.7M · quality 57.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -9.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · GRA.TOLocal privado en este navegador · NanoXplore Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$358M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

110.8x

↑

ROE

-9.7%

↓

Gross Margin

16.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.23

↓
52-Week Range$2
$2$3

TradingView lightweight chart

GRA.TO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.970Periodo -6.2%
Fair value: $1.970

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-6.6%

FCF / Net income

0.87x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $126.4M · net income $-9.7M · FCF $-8.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

16.9%+12.5% pts

Operating margin

-6.7%+11.4% pts

Net margin

-7.6%+9.2% pts

FCF margin

-6.6%+19.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$126.4M$126.4M$128.6M$122.7M$92.3M
Net Income$-9.7M$-9.7M$-11.7M$-12.8M$-15.5M
EBITDA$3.1M$3.1M$1.4M$-2.5M$-7.9M
EPS-0.06-0.06-0.07-0.08-0.10
Gross Margin16.9%16.9%16.1%12.6%4.4%
Operating Margin-6.7%-6.7%-8.2%-9.0%-18.1%
Net Margin-7.6%-7.6%-9.1%-10.4%-16.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.230.230.190.210.25
Current Ratio2.872.87———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-8.4M$-8.4M$-5.4M$-5.7M$-24.2M
Returns
ROE-9.7%-9.7%-10.8%-11.0%-13.2%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA110.78110.78299.55——
P/B3.383.384.064.834.49
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-1.7%-1.7%4.8%32.9%—
EPS Growth14.3%14.3%12.5%20.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -17.2%

Total return

-17.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.07 → -0.06

Residual

-17.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-17.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.