StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HAYD.L$0.33-1.15%
Fair $0.33+0.0%

HAYD.L

Haydale plc

Basic Materials / Specialty ChemicalsLSE

$0.33

-0.00 (-1.15%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.33Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.1M · quality 69.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -1.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · HAYD.LLocal privado en este navegador · Haydale plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$25M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-107.7%

↓

Gross Margin

58.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.60

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

HAYD.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.326Periodo -99.4%
Fair value: $0.326

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+18.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-72.2%

FCF / Net income

0.57x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.8M · net income $-6.1M · FCF $-3.5M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

58.3%-9.8% pts

Operating margin

-97.4%+25.2% pts

Net margin

-126.8%-9.4% pts

FCF margin

-72.2%-14.6% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$4.8M$4.8M$4.3M$2.9M$2.9M
Net Income$-6.1M$-6.1M$-6.2M$-4.8M$-3.4M
EBITDA$-4.4M$-4.4M$-4.1M$-3.7M$-2.3M
EPS-0.00-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.01
Gross Margin58.3%58.3%55.6%60.2%68.2%
Operating Margin-97.4%-97.4%-131.0%-161.3%-122.6%
Net Margin-126.8%-126.8%-143.3%-165.8%-117.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.600.600.550.610.66
Current Ratio2.282.28———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.5M$-3.5M$-4.3M$-4.1M$-1.7M
Returns
ROE-107.7%-107.7%-88.4%-68.2%-50.4%
Valuation
P/B103.38103.38116.16363.79502.21
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth12.1%12.1%48.3%-0.1%—
EPS Growth59.6%59.6%0.0%0.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +100.1%

Total return

+100.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.00

Residual

+100.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+100.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.