StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HFEL.L$278.19+1.34%
Fair $278.19+0.0%

HFEL.L

Henderson Far East Income Limited

Financial Services / Asset ManagementLSE

$278.19

+3.69 (+1.34%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $278.19Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 54/C
F-Score: 3/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 25.0/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 57/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

54/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · HFEL.LLocal privado en este navegador · Henderson Far East Income Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$584M

P/E

3.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

11.1%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$278
$215$279

TradingView lightweight chart

HFEL.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $278.19Periodo +111.5%
Fair value: $278.19

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+60.1%

FCF CAGR

+4.7%

FCF margin

81.4%

FCF / Net income

0.94x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $52.0M · net income $45.1M · FCF $42.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

86.8%+24.0% pts

FCF margin

81.4%-209.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$52.0M$52.0M$43.8M$-51.3M$12.7M
Net Income$45.1M$45.1M$39.3M$-56.2M$8.0M
EPS0.260.260.24-0.350.05
Net Margin86.8%86.8%89.8%109.6%62.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.120.040.080.04
Current Ratio0.510.51———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$42.3M$42.3M$46.0M$32.4M$36.8M
Returns
ROE11.1%11.1%10.7%-15.5%1.8%
Valuation
P/E3.863.86913.04—5439.77
P/B116.61116.6198.1195.5999.29
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth18.7%18.7%185.3%-505.0%—
EPS Growth9.3%9.3%168.2%-777.4%—
Dividend Yield9.1%9.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

353.9%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$24.68

Spread vs growth

-344.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

157.5%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$29.87

Spread vs growth

-148.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

68.3%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$48.10

Spread vs growth

-59.0%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +37.0%

Total return

+37.0%

Start / end P/E

900.6x → 1053.7x

EPS bridge

0.24 → 0.26

Residual

+1.6%

EPS growth+9.3%
Multiple rerating+17.0%
Dividend+9.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+1.6%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.