StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HIFS$287.99+1.68%
Fair $287.99+0.0%

HIFS

Hingham Institution for Savings

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalNasdaqGM

$287.99

+4.75 (+1.68%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $287.99Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 6/9
High Debt

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 33.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 67/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 3.05, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · HIFSLocal privado en este navegador · Hingham Institution for Savings
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$633M

P/E

12.6x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

11.4%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

3.05

↑
52-Week Range$288
$221$338

TradingView lightweight chart

HIFS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $287.05Periodo +1813.7%
Fair value: $287.99

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.9%

FCF CAGR

-12.7%

FCF margin

34.0%

FCF / Net income

0.65x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $104.4M · net income $54.6M · FCF $35.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

52.3%+8.3% pts

FCF margin

34.0%-28.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$104.4M$104.4M$65.9M$64.6M$85.4M
Net Income$54.6M$54.6M$28.2M$26.4M$37.5M
EPS24.7624.7612.8512.0217.04
Net Margin52.3%52.3%42.8%40.8%43.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity3.053.053.474.153.31
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$35.5M$35.5M$11.8M$18.5M$53.3M
Returns
ROE11.4%11.4%6.5%6.5%9.7%
Valuation
P/E12.5812.5819.9916.6416.75
P/B1.321.321.311.081.63
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth58.5%58.5%2.0%-24.4%—
EPS Growth92.7%92.7%6.9%-29.5%—
Dividend Yield0.9%0.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

1.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$25.55

Spread vs growth

91.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

4.5%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$30.92

Spread vs growth

88.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

7.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$49.80

Spread vs growth

85.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +19.1%

Total return

+19.1%

Start / end P/E

18.9x → 11.6x

EPS bridge

12.85 → 24.76

Residual

-35.8%

EPS growth+92.7%
Multiple rerating-38.6%
Dividend+0.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-35.8%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.