StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
HRS.BO$241.35-0.34%
Fair $241.35+0.0%

HRS.BO

HRS.BO

Basic Materials / AluminumBSE

$241.35

-0.80 (-0.34%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $241.35Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-167.6M · quality 64.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · HRS.BOLocal privado en este navegador · HRS.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$4.7B

P/E

36.6x

↑

EV/EBITDA

27.6x

↑

ROE

13.5%

↑

Gross Margin

52.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.52

↑
52-Week Range$241
$126$293

TradingView lightweight chart

HRS.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $236.20Periodo +78.5%
Fair value: $241.35

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+44.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-52.7%

FCF / Net income

-3.48x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $675.3M · net income $102.1M · FCF $-355.6M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

52.9%+35.3% pts

Operating margin

23.8%+16.4% pts

Net margin

15.1%+11.3% pts

FCF margin

-52.7%+18.3% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$675.3M$675.3M$421.1M$266.9M$225.5M
Net Income$102.1M$102.1M$51.5M$17.9M$8.7M
EBITDA$182.6M$182.6M$107.4M$35.3M$16.5M
EPS——2.670.930.45
Gross Margin52.9%52.9%54.2%24.0%17.6%
Operating Margin23.8%23.8%22.2%12.5%7.4%
Net Margin15.1%15.1%12.2%6.7%3.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.520.521.922.442.18
Current Ratio1.831.83———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-355.6M$-355.6M$-167.6M$-87.4M$-160.0M
Returns
ROE13.5%13.5%25.6%17.9%10.6%
Valuation
P/E36.6236.62———
EV/EBITDA27.6427.64———
P/B6.176.17———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth60.4%60.4%57.8%18.3%—
EPS Growth——188.1%105.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +78.5%

Total return

+78.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.67 → n/d

Residual

+78.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+78.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.