StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ICBC19.BK$2.78+1.46%
Fair $2.78+0.0%

ICBC19.BK

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited

Financial Services / Banks - DiversifiedThailand

$2.78

+0.04 (+1.46%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.78Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 33/D
F-Score: 4/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 38.0/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 76/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

33/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ICBC19.BKLocal privado en este navegador · Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$9.91T

P/E

5.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

8.7%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.65

↑
52-Week Range$3
$2$3

TradingView lightweight chart

ICBC19.BK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.780Periodo +15.8%
Fair value: $2.780

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-1.5%

FCF CAGR

+10.0%

FCF margin

222.2%

FCF / Net income

5.03x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $833.50B · net income $368.56B · FCF $1.85T

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

44.2%+2.8% pts

FCF margin

222.2%+62.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$833.50B$833.50B$817.28B$838.05B$871.34B
Net Income$368.56B$368.56B$365.86B$363.99B$361.13B
EPS0.100.100.980.980.97
Net Margin44.2%44.2%44.8%43.4%41.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.650.650.650.510.41
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1852.29B$1852.29B$543.61B$1402.51B$1390.94B
Returns
ROE8.7%8.7%9.2%9.7%10.3%
Valuation
P/E5.675.67———
P/B2.412.41———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth2.0%2.0%-2.5%-3.8%—
EPS Growth-89.8%-89.8%0.0%1.0%—
Dividend Yield4.5%4.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

35.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.25

Spread vs growth

-124.9%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

24.4%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.30

Spread vs growth

-114.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

17.0%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.48

Spread vs growth

-106.8%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +20.3%

Total return

+20.3%

Start / end P/E

2.4x → 27.8x

EPS bridge

0.98 → 0.10

Residual

-929.5%

EPS growth-89.8%
Multiple rerating+1035.2%
Dividend+4.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-929.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.