StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ICUGS.IS$6.00-1.96%
Fair $6.00+0.0%

ICUGS.IS

ICU Girisim Sermayesi Yatirim Ortakligi A.S.

Financial Services / Asset ManagementIstanbul

$6.00

-0.12 (-1.96%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.00Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -47.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ICUGS.ISLocal privado en este navegador · ICU Girisim Sermayesi Yatirim Ortakligi A.S.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.1B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-47.1%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$6
$2$7

TradingView lightweight chart

ICUGS.IS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6.000Periodo +5669.2%
Fair value: $6.000

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-198.5M · FCF $-1.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue——$40.4M$19.1M—
Net Income$-198.5M$-198.5M$-65.8M$-10.7M$-11.3M
EBITDA$-198.3M$-198.3M$-65.3M$-9.5M$-11.0M
EPS-0.57-0.57-0.19-0.05-0.05
Gross Margin——27.7%61.4%—
Operating Margin——-40.1%-2.5%—
Net Margin——-162.9%-56.1%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.120.090.750.72
Current Ratio0.420.42———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.2M$-1.2M$-134.3M$-2.3M$8.9M
Returns
ROE-47.1%-47.1%-10.6%-16.1%-20.8%
Valuation
P/B4.954.953.041.370.62
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth——111.7%——
EPS Growth-200.0%-200.0%-268.2%4.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +171.7%

Total return

+171.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.19 → -0.57

Residual

+171.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+171.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.