StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
INDLEASE.BO$8.40-1.18%
Fair $8.40+0.0%

INDLEASE.BO

India Lease Development Limited

Financial Services / Credit ServicesBSE

$8.40

-0.10 (-1.18%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $8.40Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 2/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 52/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

2/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · INDLEASE.BOLocal privado en este navegador · India Lease Development Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$123M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-1.1%

↓

Gross Margin

39.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$8
$7$13

TradingView lightweight chart

INDLEASE.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $8.400Periodo -33.9%
Fair value: $8.400

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-122.2%

FCF / Net income

5.65x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $5.4M · net income $-1.2M · FCF $-6.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

39.7%+0.1% pts

Operating margin

-24.6%-561.0% pts

Net margin

-21.6%+6.1% pts

FCF margin

-122.2%-24.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$5.4M$5.4M$5.5M$5.1M$5.0M
Net Income$-1.2M$-1.2M$-1.5M$-848000.00$-1.4M
EBITDA$-1.3M$-1.3M$-242000.00$-722000.00$26.7M
EPS-0.08-0.08-0.10-0.06-0.09
Gross Margin39.7%39.7%40.4%41.3%39.6%
Operating Margin-24.6%-24.6%-4.6%-14.4%536.4%
Net Margin-21.6%-21.6%-28.0%-16.5%-27.7%
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.6M$-6.6M$-6.7M$-5.7M$-4.9M
Returns
ROE-1.1%-1.1%-1.4%-0.8%-1.3%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA————6.93
P/B1.181.181.330.811.74
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-0.8%-0.8%6.3%3.4%—
EPS Growth20.0%20.0%-66.7%33.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -19.2%

Total return

-19.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.10 → -0.08

Residual

-19.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-19.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.