StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
JCFN.TA$3100.00+0.32%
Fair $3100.00+0.0%

JCFN.TA

Jacob Finance and Investments Ltd

Financial Services / Credit ServicesTel Aviv

$3100.00

+10.00 (+0.32%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3100.00Fund rank 17/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 1/9
High Debt

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 75.0/100

Data gap 17/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 9/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 5.67, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · JCFN.TALocal privado en este navegador · Jacob Finance and Investments Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$762M

P/E

9.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

18.2%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

5.67

↑
52-Week Range$3100
$2347$3900

TradingView lightweight chart

JCFN.TA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3,100Periodo +37.7%
Fair value: $3,100

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+14.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-8.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.12x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $115.7M · net income $82.5M · FCF $-10.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

71.3%+9.5% pts

FCF margin

-8.7%+185.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$115.7M$115.7M$99.3M$85.3M$76.8M
Net Income$82.5M$82.5M$69.5M$56.8M$47.5M
EPS——2.832.311.94
Net Margin71.3%71.3%70.0%66.6%61.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity5.675.674.913.775.27
Current Ratio1.131.13———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-10.0M$-10.0M$10.6M$-16.3M$-149.4M
Returns
ROE18.2%18.2%18.7%18.8%19.4%
Valuation
P/E9.259.25773.85591.34721.65
P/B167.76167.76144.82111.26140.31
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth16.5%16.5%16.4%11.0%—
EPS Growth——22.5%19.1%—
Dividend Yield1.5%1.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +23.5%

Total return

+23.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.83 → n/d

Residual

+22.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+22.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.