StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
JCGIL.XC$282.00+0.00%
Fair $282.00+0.0%

JCGIL.XC

JPMorgan China Growth & Income plc

Financial Services / Asset ManagementCboe UK

$282.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $282.00Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 5/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · JCGIL.XCLocal privado en este navegador · JPMorgan China Growth & Income plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$231M

P/E

3525.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

22.5%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$282
$2$225

TradingView lightweight chart

JCGIL.XC price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $225.00Periodo +27.1%
Fair value: $282.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

+113.1%

FCF margin

3.1%

FCF / Net income

0.03x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $64.4M · net income $63.5M · FCF $2.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

98.5%-2.0% pts

FCF margin

3.1%+3.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$64.4M$64.4M$7.3M$-42.3M$-169.3M
Net Income$63.5M$63.5M$6.3M$-43.1M$-170.1M
EPS0.760.760.08-0.52-2.04
Net Margin98.5%98.5%86.7%102.1%100.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.040.140.20
Current Ratio2.252.25———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$2.0M$2.0M$1.4M$-447000.00$203000.00
Returns
ROE22.5%22.5%2.8%-18.8%-59.8%
Valuation
P/E3525.003525.003504.61——
P/B83.3183.3197.3385.3792.48
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth783.8%783.8%117.2%75.0%—
EPS Growth905.5%905.5%114.6%74.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

220.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$25.02

Spread vs growth

685.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

108.8%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$30.28

Spread vs growth

796.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

51.5%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$48.76

Spread vs growth

854.0%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.0%

Total return

+0.0%

Start / end P/E

2964.4x → 294.8x

EPS bridge

0.08 → 0.76

Residual

-815.5%

EPS growth+905.5%
Multiple rerating-90.1%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-815.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.