StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
JYOTIRES.BO$920.25-0.64%
Fair $920.25+0.0%

JYOTIRES.BO

Jyoti Resins and Adhesives Limited

Basic Materials / Specialty ChemicalsBSE

$920.25

-5.95 (-0.64%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $920.25Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $245.9M · quality 40.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 36/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · JYOTIRES.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Jyoti Resins and Adhesives Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$11.0B

P/E

15.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

11.0x

↑

ROE

24.2%

↑

Gross Margin

70.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$920
$700$1570

TradingView lightweight chart

JYOTIRES.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $922.60Periodo -29.4%
Fair value: $920.25

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

14.1%

FCF / Net income

0.63x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.15B · net income $699.8M · FCF $444.1M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

70.2%+23.4% pts

Operating margin

26.4%+3.7% pts

Net margin

22.2%+4.5% pts

FCF margin

14.1%+14.7% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$3.15B$3.15B$2.84B$2.57B$2.61B
Net Income$699.8M$699.8M$738.7M$671.2M$464.4M
EBITDA$965.4M$965.4M$1.00B$907.4M$628.9M
EPS——62.0055.9338.70
Gross Margin70.2%70.2%69.0%65.2%46.7%
Operating Margin26.4%26.4%30.9%32.2%22.7%
Net Margin22.2%22.2%26.0%26.1%17.8%
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$444.1M$444.1M$130.2M$245.9M$-16.4M
Returns
ROE24.2%24.2%32.2%40.4%43.8%
Valuation
P/E15.8615.8619.71——
EV/EBITDA11.0311.0314.10——
P/B3.823.826.35——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.8%10.8%10.4%-1.5%—
EPS Growth——10.9%44.5%—
Dividend Yield1.0%1.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -32.0%

Total return

-32.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

62.00 → n/d

Residual

-32.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-32.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.