StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KANISHK.BO$33.25+4.48%
Fair $33.25+0.0%

KANISHK.BO

Kanishk Aluminium India Limited

Basic Materials / AluminumBSE

$33.25

+1.50 (+4.48%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $33.25Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 15%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-20.1M · quality 29.3/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 17/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · KANISHK.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Kanishk Aluminium India Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$447M

P/E

14.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

10.1x

↓

ROE

18.4%

↑

Gross Margin

17.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.37

↑
52-Week Range$33
$23$58

TradingView lightweight chart

KANISHK.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $35.00Periodo -36.9%
Fair value: $33.25

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+19.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-3.4%

FCF / Net income

-0.66x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $597.8M · net income $30.4M · FCF $-20.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

17.9%+4.4% pts

Operating margin

9.6%+4.3% pts

Net margin

5.1%+4.4% pts

FCF margin

-3.4%-4.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$597.8M$597.8M$593.0M$591.6M$347.9M
Net Income$30.4M$30.4M$15.2M$17.6M$2.6M
EBITDA$66.3M$66.3M$45.0M$40.6M$23.0M
EPS——1.131.310.19
Gross Margin17.9%17.9%13.7%12.6%13.5%
Operating Margin9.6%9.6%6.2%5.3%5.3%
Net Margin5.1%5.1%2.6%3.0%0.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.371.371.544.404.70
Current Ratio1.801.80———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-20.1M$-20.1M$17.5M$-46.9M$4.9M
Returns
ROE18.4%18.4%11.3%29.4%6.0%
Valuation
P/E14.7114.71———
EV/EBITDA10.1510.15———
P/B2.702.70———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth0.8%0.8%0.2%70.0%—
EPS Growth——-13.7%591.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -36.9%

Total return

-36.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.13 → n/d

Residual

-36.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-36.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.