StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KAV.L$0.80+0.00%
Fair $0.80+0.0%

KAV.L

Kavango Resources Plc

Basic Materials / Other Industrial Metals & MiningLSE

$0.80

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.80Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 15/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-9.5M · quality 72.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

15/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -69.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · KAV.LLocal privado en este navegador · Kavango Resources Plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$35M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-69.9%

↓

Gross Margin

-139.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

KAV.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.800Periodo -75.4%
Fair value: $0.800

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-809.5%

FCF / Net income

0.93x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.7M · net income $-14.9M · FCF $-13.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

-139.0%— pts

Operating margin

-754.0%— pts

Net margin

-870.2%— pts

FCF margin

-809.5%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.7M$1.7M$445000.00——
Net Income$-14.9M$-14.9M$-8.7M$-3.3M$-2.2M
EBITDA$-14.6M$-14.6M$-8.4M$-3.3M$-2.2M
EPS——-0.01-0.00-0.00
Gross Margin-139.0%-139.0%-8.8%——
Operating Margin-754.0%-754.0%-1321.1%——
Net Margin-870.2%-870.2%-1946.5%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.36——
Current Ratio4.254.25———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-13.9M$-13.9M$-9.5M$-5.9M$-4.4M
Returns
ROE-69.9%-69.9%-64.9%-18.1%-17.4%
Valuation
P/B137.21137.2193.3726.2254.33
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth285.6%285.6%———
EPS Growth——-31.1%8.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -5.9%

Total return

-5.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

-5.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-5.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.