StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KAV.ST$5.30-1.85%
Fair $5.30+0.0%

KAV.ST

KAV.ST

Financial Services / Asset ManagementStockholm

$5.30

-0.10 (-1.85%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $5.30Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 5/F
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 22/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

5/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -38.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · KAV.STLocal privado en este navegador · KAV.ST
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$64M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-38.9%

↓

Gross Margin

-40.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$5
$4$12

TradingView lightweight chart

KAV.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $5.300Periodo -88.5%
Fair value: $5.300

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-14.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-639.2%

FCF / Net income

0.51x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.6M · net income $-20.7M · FCF $-10.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

-40.2%+46.6% pts

Operating margin

-564.1%-79.7% pts

Net margin

-1256.3%-230.1% pts

FCF margin

-639.2%-175.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.6M$1.6M$405555.00$1.0M$2.6M
Net Income$-20.7M$-20.7M$-16.7M$-47.3M$-27.1M
EBITDA$-20.6M$-20.6M$-16.7M$-47.3M$-27.1M
EPS-2.09-2.09-2.10-6.83-4.65
Gross Margin-40.2%-40.2%-334.8%-220.4%-86.8%
Operating Margin-564.1%-564.1%-2372.6%-1343.3%-484.4%
Net Margin-1256.3%-1256.3%-4124.4%-4672.1%-1026.2%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio2.452.45———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-10.5M$-10.5M$-16.3M$-18.0M$-12.3M
Returns
ROE-38.9%-38.9%-27.3%-77.6%-30.3%
Valuation
P/B0.990.991.571.331.66
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth306.2%306.2%-60.0%-61.7%—
EPS Growth0.5%0.5%69.2%-47.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -47.0%

Total return

-47.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-2.10 → -2.09

Residual

-47.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-47.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.