StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KIB.KW$262.00-0.76%
Fair $262.00+0.0%

KIB.KW

Kuwait International Bank K.S.C.P.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalKuwait

$262.00

-2.00 (-0.76%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $262.00Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 6/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 19.0/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 72/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · KIB.KWLocal privado en este navegador · Kuwait International Bank K.S.C.P.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$457M

P/E

26.2x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

6.3%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.20

↓
52-Week Range$262
$217$282

TradingView lightweight chart

KIB.KW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $262.00Periodo -72.3%
Fair value: $262.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+17.1%

FCF CAGR

+15.8%

FCF margin

116.0%

FCF / Net income

3.86x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $100.3M · net income $30.1M · FCF $116.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

30.0%+8.2% pts

FCF margin

116.0%-4.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$100.3M$100.3M$91.4M$72.5M$62.4M
Net Income$30.1M$30.1M$23.1M$19.1M$13.6M
EPS0.010.010.010.010.01
Net Margin30.0%30.0%25.3%26.3%21.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.200.200.220.222.31
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$116.3M$116.3M$2.5M$68.6M$74.9M
Returns
ROE6.3%6.3%5.2%4.5%3.9%
Valuation
P/E26.2026.2017381.8715370.7524231.99
P/B958.88958.88687.84502.74588.91
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.8%9.8%26.0%16.1%—
EPS Growth37.6%37.6%10.7%41.8%—
Dividend Yield3.0%3.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

1090.2%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$23.25

Spread vs growth

-1052.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

359.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$28.13

Spread vs growth

-321.5%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

124.7%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$45.30

Spread vs growth

-87.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +18.1%

Total return

+18.1%

Start / end P/E

22718.7x → 18999.3x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.01

Residual

-6.2%

EPS growth+37.6%
Multiple rerating-16.4%
Dividend+3.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-6.2%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.