StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KINS.KW$490.00-1.61%
Fair $490.00+0.0%

KINS.KW

Kuwait Insurance Company S.A.K.P.

Financial Services / Insurance - DiversifiedKuwait

$490.00

-8.00 (-1.61%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $490.00Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 1/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 31.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 20/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · KINS.KWLocal privado en este navegador · Kuwait Insurance Company S.A.K.P.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$117M

P/E

16.3x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

5.3%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$490
$380$586

TradingView lightweight chart

KINS.KW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $490.00Periodo +68.4%
Fair value: $490.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-16.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-9.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.42x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $39.6M · net income $9.0M · FCF $-3.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

22.7%-42.3% pts

FCF margin

-9.6%-18.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$39.6M$39.6M$42.8M$35.3M$67.9M
Net Income$9.0M$9.0M$10.9M$12.1M$44.1M
EPS0.040.040.050.050.19
Net Margin22.7%22.7%25.5%34.3%65.0%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio109.55109.55———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.8M$-3.8M$2.5M$3.1M$6.0M
Returns
ROE5.3%5.3%7.1%8.5%31.7%
Valuation
P/E16.3316.339986.527239.692094.41
P/B686.38686.38706.71618.93664.61
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-7.5%-7.5%21.2%-48.0%—
EPS Growth-17.9%-17.9%-10.0%-72.5%—
Dividend Yield8.0%8.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

949.0%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$43.48

Spread vs growth

-966.9%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

325.6%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$52.61

Spread vs growth

-343.5%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

116.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$84.73

Spread vs growth

-134.2%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +30.6%

Total return

+30.6%

Start / end P/E

8717.0x → 13008.7x

EPS bridge

0.05 → 0.04

Residual

-8.8%

EPS growth-17.9%
Multiple rerating+49.2%
Dividend+8.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-8.8%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.