StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KPROJ.KW$80.70+0.75%
Fair $80.70+0.0%

KPROJ.KW

Kuwait Projects Company Holding K.S.C.P.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalKuwait

$80.70

+0.60 (+0.75%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $80.70Fund rank 20/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 22/D
F-Score: 1/9
High DebtLow Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 11.0/100

Data gap 20/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

22/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 2unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 2.75, above the 2.0 threshold ROE is 2.0%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · KPROJ.KWLocal privado en este navegador · Kuwait Projects Company Holding K.S.C.P.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$368M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

2.0%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

2.75

↑
52-Week Range$81
$75$97

TradingView lightweight chart

KPROJ.KW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $80.70Periodo -97.9%
Fair value: $80.70

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+54.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-95.4%

FCF / Net income

-54.45x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $932.6M · net income $16.3M · FCF $-889.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

1.8%-8.2% pts

FCF margin

-95.4%+45.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$932.6M$932.6M$879.1M$763.6M$252.9M
Net Income$16.3M$16.3M$15.6M$30.0M$25.3M
EPS——0.000.010.01
Net Margin1.8%1.8%1.8%3.9%10.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity2.752.752.282.623.07
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-889.3M$-889.3M$229.7M$780.5M$-354.9M
Returns
ROE2.0%2.0%1.9%3.8%3.4%
Valuation
P/E——52500.0021568.6314637.68
P/B444.10444.10525.39627.79362.47
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth6.1%6.1%15.1%201.9%—
EPS Growth——-64.7%-26.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -10.8%

Total return

-10.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.00 → n/d

Residual

-10.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-10.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.