StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KRITIKA.NS$6.11-0.65%
Fair $6.11+0.0%

KRITIKA.NS

Kritika Wires Limited

Basic Materials / SteelNSE

$6.11

-0.04 (-0.65%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.11Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $41.6M · quality 40.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 13/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · KRITIKA.NSLocal privado en este navegador · Kritika Wires Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.6B

P/E

26.6x

↑

EV/EBITDA

13.8x

↑

ROE

6.1%

↑

Gross Margin

7.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.55

↑
52-Week Range$6
$5$11

TradingView lightweight chart

KRITIKA.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6.120Periodo +170.8%
Fair value: $6.110

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+36.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.3%

FCF / Net income

2.53x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.94B · net income $61.9M · FCF $156.5M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

7.5%+2.7% pts

Operating margin

1.4%-1.4% pts

Net margin

0.9%-1.3% pts

FCF margin

2.3%+5.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$6.94B$6.94B$7.45B$4.23B$2.76B
Net Income$61.9M$61.9M$101.3M$104.0M$59.9M
EBITDA$157.1M$157.1M$243.3M$186.8M$123.4M
EPS——0.380.390.22
Gross Margin7.5%7.5%7.0%4.6%4.8%
Operating Margin1.4%1.4%0.7%2.8%2.8%
Net Margin0.9%0.9%1.4%2.5%2.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.550.550.540.480.30
Current Ratio1.901.90———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$156.5M$156.5M$-76.3M$41.6M$-77.7M
Returns
ROE6.1%6.1%10.7%12.3%8.1%
Valuation
P/E26.5726.5722.4238.4619.09
EV/EBITDA13.8213.8211.3122.5210.73
P/B1.611.612.414.741.51
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-6.8%-6.8%76.1%53.4%—
EPS Growth——-2.6%77.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -39.7%

Total return

-39.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.38 → n/d

Residual

-39.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-39.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.