StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
KUO.SI$0.07-6.85%
Fair $0.07+0.0%

KUO.SI

International Cement Group Ltd.

Basic Materials / Building MaterialsSES

$0.07

-0.00 (-6.85%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.07Fund rank 38/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 68/B
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $37.3M · quality 80.0/100

Data gap 38/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 77/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

68/100

B

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · KUO.SILocal privado en este navegador · International Cement Group Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$390M

P/E

6.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.0x

↓

ROE

19.6%

↑

Gross Margin

38.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.11

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

KUO.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.068Periodo +61.9%
Fair value: $0.068

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+18.9%

FCF CAGR

+32.0%

FCF margin

9.9%

FCF / Net income

0.62x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $378.8M · net income $60.0M · FCF $37.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

38.6%-3.1% pts

Operating margin

21.8%-0.2% pts

Net margin

15.8%+3.0% pts

FCF margin

9.9%+2.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$378.8M$378.8M$257.3M$257.4M$225.2M
Net Income$60.0M$60.0M$135000.00$13.7M$28.9M
EBITDA$139.3M$139.3M$53.7M$63.8M$66.2M
EPS——0.000.000.01
Gross Margin38.6%38.6%35.6%35.0%41.7%
Operating Margin21.8%21.8%5.7%16.7%22.1%
Net Margin15.8%15.8%0.1%5.3%12.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.110.110.190.150.18
Current Ratio1.431.43———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$37.3M$37.3M$24.4M$40.1M$16.2M
Returns
ROE19.6%19.6%0.1%5.6%12.4%
Valuation
P/E6.806.80900.007.144.60
EV/EBITDA2.962.962.672.012.45
P/B1.281.280.430.400.56
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth47.2%47.2%-0.1%14.3%—
EPS Growth——-99.2%-52.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +257.9%

Total return

+257.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.00 → n/d

Residual

+257.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+257.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.