StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MAKO$8.50-2.30%
Fair $8.50+0.0%

MAKO

Mako Mining Corp.

Basic Materials / GoldNasdaqCM

$8.50

-0.20 (-2.30%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $8.50Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 72/B
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $21.6M · quality 76.3/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 71/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

72/100

B

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · MAKOLocal privado en este navegador · Mako Mining Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$744M

P/E

15.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

10.4x

↓

ROE

22.4%

↑

Gross Margin

50.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$9
$4$9

TradingView lightweight chart

MAKO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $8.500Periodo -10.5%
Fair value: $8.500

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+32.8%

FCF CAGR

+75.0%

FCF margin

27.4%

FCF / Net income

1.21x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $148.5M · net income $33.7M · FCF $40.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

50.5%+31.5% pts

Operating margin

36.5%+45.4% pts

Net margin

22.7%+41.6% pts

FCF margin

27.4%+15.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$148.5M$148.5M$92.1M$65.9M$63.4M
Net Income$33.7M$33.7M$19.2M$6.8M$-12.0M
EBITDA$63.9M$63.9M$37.8M$23.3M$12.2M
EPS——0.260.10-0.18
Gross Margin50.5%50.5%50.4%36.4%19.0%
Operating Margin36.5%36.5%37.2%18.7%-8.8%
Net Margin22.7%22.7%20.8%10.3%-18.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.090.531.15
Current Ratio3.203.20———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$40.7M$40.7M$21.6M$7.7M$7.6M
Returns
ROE22.4%22.4%24.9%33.0%-87.6%
Valuation
P/E15.4515.459.1918.20—
EV/EBITDA10.3610.364.455.608.76
P/B4.914.912.295.876.74
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth61.2%61.2%39.6%4.1%—
EPS Growth——160.0%155.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +139.4%

Total return

+139.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.26 → n/d

Residual

+139.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+139.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.