StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MCL.NS$61.59+1.70%
Fair $61.59+0.0%

MCL.NS

M Tek Copper Limited

Basic Materials / CopperNSE

$61.59

+1.03 (+1.70%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $61.59Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-6.0M · quality 40.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · MCL.NSLocal privado en este navegador · M Tek Copper Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.7B

P/E

36.2x

↑

EV/EBITDA

27.7x

↑

ROE

10.3%

↑

Gross Margin

9.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.56

↑
52-Week Range$62
$42$93

TradingView lightweight chart

MCL.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $61.59Periodo +427.9%
Fair value: $61.59

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+0.7%

FCF CAGR

+61.3%

FCF margin

1.9%

FCF / Net income

0.52x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.25B · net income $46.9M · FCF $24.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

9.7%+7.5% pts

Operating margin

3.7%+5.8% pts

Net margin

3.8%+5.8% pts

FCF margin

1.9%+1.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.25B$1.25B$355.0M—$1.22B
Net Income$46.9M$46.9M$12.3M$-44.1M$-24.4M
EBITDA$69.6M$69.6M$35.7M$-24.6M$18.6M
EPS1.731.730.45-1.63-0.90
Gross Margin9.7%9.7%4.6%—2.2%
Operating Margin3.7%3.7%-8.4%—-2.1%
Net Margin3.8%3.8%3.5%—-2.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.560.560.320.030.17
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$24.3M$24.3M$-21.8M$-6.0M$5.8M
Returns
ROE10.3%10.3%3.0%-11.1%-5.5%
Valuation
P/E36.2336.2386.22——
EV/EBITDA27.6827.6833.18—51.50
P/B3.663.662.571.742.01
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth251.2%251.2%———
EPS Growth284.4%284.4%127.6%-81.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

46.7%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$5.47

Spread vs growth

237.7%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

30.8%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$6.61

Spread vs growth

253.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

19.9%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$10.65

Spread vs growth

264.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +2.4%

Total return

+2.4%

Start / end P/E

133.6x → 35.6x

EPS bridge

0.45 → 1.73

Residual

-208.7%

EPS growth+284.4%
Multiple rerating-73.4%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-208.7%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.