StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MLHL.L$15.20-2.88%
Fair $15.20+0.0%

MLHL.L

Malibu Life Holdings Limited

Financial Services / Insurance - ReinsuranceLSE

$15.20

-0.45 (-2.88%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $15.20Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 11.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 34/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 3.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · MLHL.LLocal privado en este navegador · Malibu Life Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$259M

P/E

0.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

3.8%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$15
$14$28

TradingView lightweight chart

MLHL.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $15.20Periodo +60.0%
Fair value: $15.20

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

78.4%

FCF / Net income

2.39x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $65.2M · net income $21.4M · FCF $51.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

32.8%-70.4% pts

FCF margin

78.4%+78.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$65.2M$65.2M$122.9M$16.7M$-245.9M
Net Income$21.4M$21.4M$114.3M$11.4M$-253.7M
EPS1.231.236.430.53-8.18
Net Margin32.8%32.8%93.0%68.4%103.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity————0.22
Current Ratio310.31310.31———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$51.1M$51.1M$59591.00$150.1M$-400995.00
Returns
ROE3.8%3.8%20.2%1.8%-37.5%
Valuation
P/E0.120.123.9236.51—
P/B0.460.460.790.650.93
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-47.0%-47.0%636.5%106.8%—
EPS Growth-80.9%-80.9%1113.3%106.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

3.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.35

Spread vs growth

-84.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

5.8%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$1.63

Spread vs growth

-86.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

7.9%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$2.63

Spread vs growth

-88.8%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -35.6%

Total return

-35.6%

Start / end P/E

3.7x → 12.4x

EPS bridge

6.43 → 1.23

Residual

-191.5%

EPS growth-80.9%
Multiple rerating+236.7%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-191.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.