StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MNB.AX$0.02+4.55%
Fair $0.02+0.0%

MNB.AX

Minbos Resources Limited

Basic Materials / Agricultural InputsASX

$0.02

+0.00 (+4.55%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.02Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 15/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-16.3M · quality 72.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

15/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -24.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · MNB.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Minbos Resources Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$27M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-24.4%

↓

Gross Margin

100.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

MNB.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.023Periodo -98.9%
Fair value: $0.023

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-42864.5%

FCF / Net income

2.38x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $43329.0 · net income $-7.8M · FCF $-18.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

100.0%— pts

Operating margin

-19793.1%— pts

Net margin

-17992.2%— pts

FCF margin

-42864.5%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$43329.00$43329.00———
Net Income$-7.8M$-7.8M$-9.7M$-7.5M$-804617.00
EBITDA$-8.3M$-8.3M$-10.3M$-7.8M$-748253.00
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.00
Gross Margin100.0%100.0%———
Operating Margin-19793.1%-19793.1%———
Net Margin-17992.2%-17992.2%———
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.020.000.01
Current Ratio2.522.52———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-18.6M$-18.6M$-12.9M$-16.3M$-11.5M
Returns
ROE-24.4%-24.4%-27.2%-29.1%-5.9%
Valuation
P/B0.700.701.392.784.91
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth27.3%27.3%-14.6%-500.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -56.6%

Total return

-56.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.01

Residual

-56.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-56.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.