StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MTRO.L$174.20+0.11%
Fair $174.20+0.0%

MTRO.L

Metro Bank Holdings PLC

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalLSE

$174.20

+0.20 (+0.11%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $174.20Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 47/C
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 12.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 4/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

47/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 3.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · MTRO.LLocal privado en este navegador · Metro Bank Holdings PLC
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.2B

P/E

21.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

3.5%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.59

↑
52-Week Range$174
$98$180

TradingView lightweight chart

MTRO.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $174.20Periodo -91.9%
Fair value: $174.20

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-199.6%

FCF / Net income

-22.40x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $588.3M · net income $52.4M · FCF $-1.17B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

8.9%+22.8% pts

FCF margin

-199.6%+36.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$588.3M$588.3M$405.3M$548.9M$523.5M
Net Income$52.4M$52.4M$42.5M$29.5M$-72.7M
EPS0.080.080.060.13-0.42
Net Margin8.9%8.9%10.5%5.4%-13.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.590.590.740.820.86
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.17B$-1.17B$-1.45B$590.0M$-1.24B
Returns
ROE3.5%3.5%3.6%2.6%-7.6%
Valuation
P/E21.7721.771582.54302.24—
P/B79.9579.9556.917.8821.29
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth45.2%45.2%-26.2%4.9%—
EPS Growth22.2%22.2%-53.0%131.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

485.5%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$15.46

Spread vs growth

-463.3%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

200.0%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$18.70

Spread vs growth

-177.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

81.7%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$30.12

Spread vs growth

-59.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +55.3%

Total return

+55.3%

Start / end P/E

1781.0x → 2262.3x

EPS bridge

0.06 → 0.08

Residual

+6.0%

EPS growth+22.2%
Multiple rerating+27.0%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+6.0%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.