StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MWL.NS$382.90+1.66%
Fair $382.90+0.0%

MWL.NS

MWL.NS

Basic Materials / SteelNSE

$382.90

+6.25 (+1.66%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $382.90Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-210.0M · quality 40.3/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 12/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · MWL.NSLocal privado en este navegador · MWL.NS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$11.4B

P/E

22.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

14.0x

↑

ROE

16.7%

↑

Gross Margin

22.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.79

↑
52-Week Range$383
$150$388

TradingView lightweight chart

MWL.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $382.90Periodo +221.5%
Fair value: $382.90

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+23.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.1%

FCF / Net income

-0.03x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $12.08B · net income $501.0M · FCF $-13.8M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

22.6%+15.4% pts

Operating margin

6.7%+4.5% pts

Net margin

4.1%+1.5% pts

FCF margin

-0.1%+15.6% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$12.08B$12.08B$10.61B$8.18B$6.44B
Net Income$501.0M$501.0M$294.8M$218.3M$172.2M
EBITDA$978.4M$978.4M$619.1M$416.2M$242.4M
EPS——10.298.457.56
Gross Margin22.6%22.6%21.1%8.9%7.2%
Operating Margin6.7%6.7%4.3%3.8%2.1%
Net Margin4.1%4.1%2.8%2.7%2.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.790.790.750.570.63
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-13.8M$-13.8M$-910.0M$-210.0M$-1.01B
Returns
ROE16.7%16.7%11.5%12.1%12.7%
Valuation
P/E22.7922.7914.7715.1414.55
EV/EBITDA14.0314.0310.1310.3913.66
P/B3.793.791.701.831.85
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth13.9%13.9%29.7%26.9%—
EPS Growth——21.8%11.8%—
Dividend Yield0.1%0.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +137.6%

Total return

+137.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

10.29 → n/d

Residual

+137.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+137.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.