StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NAIK.JK$91.00-2.15%
Fair $91.00+0.0%

NAIK.JK

NAIK.JK

Basic Materials / Building MaterialsJakarta

$91.00

-2.00 (-2.15%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $91.00Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 56/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $8.3B · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 13/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

56/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · NAIK.JKLocal privado en este navegador · NAIK.JK
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$303.0B

P/E

11.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.1x

↓

ROE

14.6%

↑

Gross Margin

31.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$91
$88$368

TradingView lightweight chart

NAIK.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $91.00Periodo -36.8%
Fair value: $91.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+27.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

14.7%

FCF / Net income

1.04x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $215.70B · net income $30.71B · FCF $31.80B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

31.5%+1.8% pts

Operating margin

15.2%+2.0% pts

Net margin

14.2%+4.1% pts

FCF margin

14.7%+33.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$215.70B$215.70B$207.17B$124.46B$105.17B
Net Income$30.71B$30.71B$30.90B$13.19B$10.66B
EBITDA$38.09B$38.09B$39.97B$21.02B$16.61B
EPS——12.004.063.28
Gross Margin31.5%31.5%29.5%30.8%29.7%
Operating Margin15.2%15.2%18.1%15.4%13.1%
Net Margin14.2%14.2%14.9%10.6%10.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.100.561.59
Current Ratio5.455.45———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$31.80B$31.80B$8.31B$-8.71B$-19.27B
Returns
ROE14.6%14.6%17.2%18.4%33.3%
Valuation
P/E11.3811.3816.67——
EV/EBITDA6.146.1411.53——
P/B1.441.442.88——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.1%4.1%66.5%18.3%—
EPS Growth——195.7%23.7%—
Dividend Yield3.3%3.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -71.3%

Total return

-71.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

12.00 → n/d

Residual

-74.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-74.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.