StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NLFL.BO$41.14-7.80%
Fair $41.14+0.0%

NLFL.BO

Nalin Lease Finance Limited

Financial Services / Credit ServicesBSE

$41.14

-3.44 (-7.80%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $41.14Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 1/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 42.0/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 8/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · NLFL.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Nalin Lease Finance Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$270M

P/E

8.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.2x

↓

ROE

8.3%

↑

Gross Margin

76.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.27

↓
52-Week Range$41
$35$66

TradingView lightweight chart

NLFL.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $40.65Periodo +821.8%
Fair value: $41.14

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-179.7%

FCF / Net income

-3.86x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $68.3M · net income $31.8M · FCF $-122.7M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

76.1%-18.6% pts

Operating margin

57.2%-9.9% pts

Net margin

46.6%-6.9% pts

FCF margin

-179.7%-232.5% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$68.3M$68.3M$63.9M$62.1M$56.0M
Net Income$31.8M$31.8M$35.2M$38.5M$29.9M
EBITDA$40.7M$40.7M$39.7M$38.1M$42.0M
EPS——5.375.874.56
Gross Margin76.1%76.1%77.7%74.1%94.7%
Operating Margin57.2%57.2%59.6%58.6%67.0%
Net Margin46.6%46.6%55.2%62.0%53.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.270.270.040.140.06
Current Ratio4.024.02———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-122.7M$-122.7M$-31.2M$10.7M$29.6M
Returns
ROE8.3%8.3%10.1%12.2%10.8%
Valuation
P/E8.488.4812.838.207.40
EV/EBITDA9.169.1611.779.355.41
P/B0.710.711.291.000.80
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth6.9%6.9%2.8%11.0%—
EPS Growth——-8.5%28.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -31.5%

Total return

-31.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

5.37 → n/d

Residual

-31.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-31.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.