StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NUTR3.SA$2.29+5.53%
Fair $2.29+0.0%

NUTR3.SA

Nutriplant Indústria e Comércio S/A

Basic Materials / Agricultural InputsSão Paulo

$2.29

+0.12 (+5.53%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.29Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 1/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.2M · quality 41.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · NUTR3.SALocal privado en este navegador · Nutriplant Indústria e Comércio S/A
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$30M

P/E

4.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.5x

↓

ROE

10.7%

↑

Gross Margin

13.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.58

↑
52-Week Range$2
$0$4

TradingView lightweight chart

NUTR3.SA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.170Periodo -27.4%
Fair value: $2.290

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+7.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-4.3%

FCF / Net income

-1.72x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $216.1M · net income $5.4M · FCF $-9.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

13.8%-2.8% pts

Operating margin

3.6%-6.0% pts

Net margin

2.5%-2.3% pts

FCF margin

-4.3%-6.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$216.1M$216.1M$200.3M$179.1M$174.8M
Net Income$5.4M$5.4M$10.3M$3.5M$8.3M
EBITDA$8.7M$8.7M$20.1M$10.9M$17.4M
EPS——0.780.260.63
Gross Margin13.8%13.8%18.2%16.4%16.6%
Operating Margin3.6%3.6%9.1%5.5%9.6%
Net Margin2.5%2.5%5.1%2.0%4.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.580.580.320.250.30
Current Ratio1.591.59———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-9.3M$-9.3M$-4.2M$5.9M$4.2M
Returns
ROE10.7%10.7%22.8%10.1%26.5%
Valuation
P/E4.094.095.0315.794.44
EV/EBITDA6.536.533.215.572.65
P/B0.600.601.151.591.18
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.9%7.9%11.8%2.4%—
EPS Growth——194.6%-58.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -34.2%

Total return

-34.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.78 → n/d

Residual

-34.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-34.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.