StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
OASISEC.BO$14.93-0.47%
Fair $14.93+0.0%

OASISEC.BO

Oasis Securities Limited

Financial Services / Capital MarketsBSE

$14.93

-0.07 (-0.47%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $14.93Fund rank 19/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 4/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 27.0/100

Data gap 19/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · OASISEC.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Oasis Securities Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$276M

P/E

27.1x

↑

EV/EBITDA

22.4x

↑

ROE

7.1%

↑

Gross Margin

84.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$15
$10$29

TradingView lightweight chart

OASISEC.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $14.93Periodo +351.1%
Fair value: $14.93

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-36.5%

FCF / Net income

-0.68x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $18.9M · net income $10.2M · FCF $-6.9M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

84.3%+29.0% pts

Operating margin

55.0%+50.9% pts

Net margin

53.9%+76.9% pts

FCF margin

-36.5%-124.4% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$18.9M$18.9M$8.1M$25.0M$18.1M
Net Income$10.2M$10.2M$8.7M$14.2M$-4.2M
EBITDA$12.1M$12.1M$11.5M$18.4M$1.8M
EPS——0.470.74-0.23
Gross Margin84.3%84.3%76.2%67.3%55.3%
Operating Margin55.0%55.0%130.4%38.0%4.2%
Net Margin53.9%53.9%107.4%56.5%-23.1%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio2460.142460.14———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.9M$-6.9M$-28.2M$-7.0M$15.9M
Returns
ROE7.1%7.1%6.6%11.5%-3.8%
Valuation
P/E27.1527.1559.9416.91—
EV/EBITDA22.4022.4045.2412.4259.16
P/B1.941.943.931.870.98
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth133.7%133.7%-67.7%38.5%—
EPS Growth——-36.5%428.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -44.9%

Total return

-44.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.47 → n/d

Residual

-44.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-44.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.