StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
OMASP.HE$12.10-1.93%
Fair $12.10+0.0%

OMASP.HE

Oma Säästöpankki Oyj

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalHelsinki

$12.10

-0.24 (-1.93%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $12.10Fund rank 19/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 4/9
High Debt

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 51.0/100

Data gap 19/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 4.51, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · OMASP.HELocal privado en este navegador · Oma Säästöpankki Oyj
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$402M

P/E

8.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

6.4%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

4.51

↑
52-Week Range$12
$8$14

TradingView lightweight chart

OMASP.HE price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $12.18Periodo +70.3%
Fair value: $12.10

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+15.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

172.1%

FCF / Net income

9.67x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $221.7M · net income $39.5M · FCF $381.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

17.8%-20.5% pts

FCF margin

172.1%+261.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$221.7M$221.7M$270.3M$247.2M$144.4M
Net Income$39.5M$39.5M$59.5M$110.1M$55.4M
EPS1.181.181.783.471.83
Net Margin17.8%17.8%22.0%44.5%38.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity4.514.514.865.615.82
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$381.6M$381.6M$189.3M$-584.4M$-128.7M
Returns
ROE6.4%6.4%10.3%20.3%15.2%
Valuation
P/E8.408.406.126.2210.21
P/B0.650.650.631.271.55
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-18.0%-18.0%9.4%71.1%—
EPS Growth-33.7%-33.7%-48.7%89.6%—
Dividend Yield2.9%2.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-3.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.07

Spread vs growth

-30.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

1.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.30

Spread vs growth

-35.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

5.9%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$2.09

Spread vs growth

-39.6%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +43.4%

Total return

+43.4%

Start / end P/E

4.9x → 10.3x

EPS bridge

1.78 → 1.18

Residual

-37.7%

EPS growth-33.7%
Multiple rerating+111.9%
Dividend+2.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-37.7%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.