StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ONO.WA$0.65-0.62%
Fair $0.65+0.0%

ONO.WA

onesano S.A.

Basic Materials / ChemicalsWarsaw

$0.65

-0.00 (-0.62%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.65Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 13/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-6.8M · quality 76.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 41/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

13/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -98.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ONO.WALocal privado en este navegador · onesano S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$43M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-98.5%

↓

Gross Margin

38.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.28

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

ONO.WA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.646Periodo +1.8%
Fair value: $0.646

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-28.1%

FCF / Net income

0.70x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $11.9M · net income $-4.8M · FCF $-3.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

38.3%-12.1% pts

Operating margin

-38.4%-13.4% pts

Net margin

-40.2%-7.8% pts

FCF margin

-28.1%+3.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$11.9M$11.9M$10.7M$12.2M$12.1M
Net Income$-4.8M$-4.8M$-5.8M$-6.4M$-3.9M
EBITDA$-4.1M$-4.1M$-4.9M$-5.7M$-2.6M
EPS——-0.09-0.10-0.09
Gross Margin38.3%38.3%43.5%40.8%50.4%
Operating Margin-38.4%-38.4%-57.7%-55.2%-25.0%
Net Margin-40.2%-40.2%-54.2%-52.3%-32.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.280.28—0.000.00
Current Ratio1.481.48———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.4M$-3.4M$-6.8M$-8.4M$-3.8M
Returns
ROE-98.5%-98.5%-60.0%-41.2%-18.0%
Valuation
P/B8.758.757.334.902.48
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth11.6%11.6%-12.2%0.4%—
EPS Growth——10.0%-11.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -34.7%

Total return

-34.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.09 → n/d

Residual

-34.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-34.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.