StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ONTIC.BO$1.20-4.69%
Fair $1.20+0.0%

ONTIC.BO

Ontic Finserve Limited

Financial Services / Capital MarketsBSE

$1.20

-0.06 (-4.69%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.20Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 49/C
F-Score: 4/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 31.0/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 54/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

49/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ONTIC.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Ontic Finserve Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$108M

P/E

20.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

14.9x

↑

ROE

14.4%

↑

Gross Margin

88.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.09

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

ONTIC.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.220Periodo -6.9%
Fair value: $1.200

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+32.6%

FCF CAGR

+181.3%

FCF margin

57.0%

FCF / Net income

1.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $9.6M · net income $5.4M · FCF $5.5M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

88.1%+6.7% pts

Operating margin

62.4%+1.7% pts

Net margin

56.3%+45.4% pts

FCF margin

57.0%+51.0% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$9.6M$9.6M$19.0M—$4.1M
Net Income$5.4M$5.4M$13.1M$-27.5M$448945.00
EBITDA$7.3M$7.3M$18.0M$-27.4M$2.5M
EPS——0.15-0.310.05
Gross Margin88.1%88.1%98.7%—81.4%
Operating Margin62.4%62.4%87.9%—60.7%
Net Margin56.3%56.3%69.1%—10.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.090.090.11——
Current Ratio7.187.18———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$5.5M$5.5M$12.4M$59000.00$246345.00
Returns
ROE14.4%14.4%42.2%-152.6%1.0%
Valuation
P/E20.0020.005.07—15.20
EV/EBITDA14.8614.863.88—27.09
P/B2.862.862.143.401.50
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-49.4%-49.4%———
EPS Growth——148.4%-720.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +82.1%

Total return

+82.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.15 → n/d

Residual

+82.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+82.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.