StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PLAKR.AT$15.70-0.63%
Fair $15.70+0.0%

PLAKR.AT

Plastika Kritis S.A.

Basic Materials / Specialty ChemicalsAthens

$15.70

-0.10 (-0.63%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $15.70Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 57/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $32.6M · quality 62.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 44/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

57/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · PLAKR.ATLocal privado en este navegador · Plastika Kritis S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$430M

P/E

11.2x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.3x

↓

ROE

9.6%

↑

Gross Margin

24.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$16
$13$17

TradingView lightweight chart

PLAKR.AT price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $15.70Periodo +33.2%
Fair value: $15.70

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+0.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

6.5%

FCF / Net income

0.60x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $385.1M · net income $41.6M · FCF $25.0M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

24.4%-1.3% pts

Operating margin

14.8%-2.8% pts

Net margin

10.8%-3.4% pts

FCF margin

6.5%+8.0% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$385.1M$385.1M$371.7M$416.3M$374.9M
Net Income$41.6M$41.6M$40.4M$38.1M$53.2M
EBITDA$67.1M$67.1M$63.7M$61.3M$77.1M
EPS——1.471.391.94
Gross Margin24.4%24.4%23.9%23.5%25.8%
Operating Margin14.8%14.8%14.4%14.5%17.6%
Net Margin10.8%10.8%10.9%9.1%14.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.020.040.03
Current Ratio7.527.52———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$25.0M$25.0M$32.6M$39.0M$-5.6M
Returns
ROE9.6%9.6%10.2%10.2%15.7%
Valuation
P/E11.2111.2110.8211.449.27
EV/EBITDA5.265.265.695.975.80
P/B0.990.991.101.171.46
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.6%3.6%-10.7%11.0%—
EPS Growth——5.8%-28.5%—
Dividend Yield3.6%3.6%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +9.0%

Total return

+9.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.47 → n/d

Residual

+5.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+5.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.