StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PNNT$3.94+0.77%
Fair $3.94+0.0%

PNNT

PennantPark Investment Corporation

Financial Services / Asset ManagementNYSE

$3.94

+0.03 (+0.77%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.94Fund rank 19/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 12/F
F-Score: 3/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 28.0/100

Data gap 19/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 1/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

12/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 6Warnings: 0unknown: 6
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · PNNTLocal privado en este navegador · PennantPark Investment Corporation
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$257M

P/E

18.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

7.1%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.59

↑
52-Week Range$4
$4$8

TradingView lightweight chart

PNNT price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.940Periodo -72.6%
Fair value: $3.940

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2020–2025 · 5 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

250.9%

FCF / Net income

3.20x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $41.8M · net income $32.7M · FCF $104.8M

2020-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

78.4%— pts

FCF margin

250.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Income Statement
Revenue$41.8M$41.8M$58.5M$-20.2M$-5.0M——
Net Income$32.7M$32.7M$48.9M$-33.8M$-24.7M$166.6M$-16.0M
EPS0.500.500.75-0.52-0.37——
Net Margin78.4%78.4%83.5%167.6%498.8%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.591.591.561.031.20——
Current Ratio0.240.24—————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$104.8M$104.8M$-172.4M$222.9M$-17.3M——
Returns
ROE7.1%7.1%9.9%-6.7%-4.2%25.2%—
Valuation
P/E18.7618.769.39————
P/B0.560.560.930.810.65——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-28.6%-28.6%390.1%-306.6%———
EPS Growth-33.3%-33.3%244.2%-40.5%———
Dividend Yield4.1%4.1%—————

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-11.2%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.35

Spread vs growth

-22.1%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-3.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.42

Spread vs growth

-30.0%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

3.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.68

Spread vs growth

-36.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -36.8%

Total return

-36.8%

Start / end P/E

8.9x → 7.9x

EPS bridge

0.75 → 0.50

Residual

+3.8%

EPS growth-33.3%
Multiple rerating-11.3%
Dividend+4.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+3.8%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.