StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
RBRL11.SA$81.29-2.06%
Fair $81.29+0.0%

RBRL11.SA

RBR Log FII

Financial Services / Asset ManagementSão Paulo

$81.29

-1.71 (-2.06%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $81.29Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 2/9
Margin Compression

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 24.0/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 92/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Operating margin has declined for 3 consecutive years
Thesis & Journal · RBRL11.SALocal privado en este navegador · RBR Log FII
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$544M

P/E

8.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.2x

↓

ROE

6.5%

↑

Gross Margin

85.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$81
$75$95

TradingView lightweight chart

RBRL11.SA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $81.29Periodo -3.2%
Fair value: $81.29

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+0.6%

FCF CAGR

+0.0%

FCF margin

81.0%

FCF / Net income

0.81x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $65.3M · net income $65.4M · FCF $52.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

85.0%-3.8% pts

Operating margin

76.0%-10.5% pts

Net margin

100.1%+31.4% pts

FCF margin

81.0%-1.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$65.3M$65.3M$61.9M$59.3M$64.1M
Net Income$65.4M$65.4M$84.9M$27.9M$44.0M
EBITDA$66.1M$66.1M$85.0M$27.9M$44.1M
EPS——12.704.176.59
Gross Margin85.0%85.0%88.9%87.9%88.8%
Operating Margin76.0%76.0%83.2%85.0%86.5%
Net Margin100.1%100.1%137.2%47.0%68.7%
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$52.9M$52.9M$53.7M$54.9M$52.9M
Returns
ROE6.5%6.5%9.0%3.3%5.3%
Valuation
P/E8.318.315.5121.6512.37
EV/EBITDA8.188.185.4921.3212.11
P/B0.540.540.500.710.66
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.6%5.6%4.3%-7.5%—
EPS Growth——204.6%-36.7%—
Dividend Yield8.9%8.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +9.3%

Total return

+9.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

12.70 → n/d

Residual

+0.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+8.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.