StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
RECY-B.ST$0.04-3.90%
Fair $0.04+0.0%

RECY-B.ST

RECY-B.ST

Basic Materials / Specialty ChemicalsStockholm

$0.04

-0.00 (-3.90%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.04Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 11/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.4M · quality 57.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 37/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

11/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is 4.0%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · RECY-B.STLocal privado en este navegador · RECY-B.ST
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

398.2%

↑

Gross Margin

69.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

RECY-B.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.039Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $0.039

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-4.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-41.8%

FCF / Net income

0.78x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $12.9M · net income $-7.0M · FCF $-5.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

69.1%+26.3% pts

Operating margin

-45.8%+44.7% pts

Net margin

-53.9%+46.7% pts

FCF margin

-41.8%+18.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$12.9M$12.9M$15.6M$14.4M$15.0M
Net Income$-7.0M$-7.0M$-9.0M$-11.0M$-15.1M
EBITDA$-4.7M$-4.7M$-6.0M$-7.5M$-11.1M
EPS——-0.69-0.51-1.71
Gross Margin69.1%69.1%59.9%61.3%42.8%
Operating Margin-45.8%-45.8%-48.9%-67.8%-90.5%
Net Margin-53.9%-53.9%-57.6%-76.0%-100.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——-1.00-10.05-6.47
Current Ratio0.180.18———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-5.4M$-5.4M$-3.0M$-6.9M$-9.0M
Returns
ROE398.2%398.2%84.0%1928.2%650.8%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-17.1%-17.1%7.9%-3.7%—
EPS Growth——-34.6%70.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -62.8%

Total return

-62.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.69 → n/d

Residual

-62.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-62.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.