StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ROMER.OL$160.00-0.81%
Fair $160.00+0.0%

ROMER.OL

Romerike Sparebank

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalOslo

$160.00

-1.30 (-0.81%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $160.00Fund rank 19/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 44/C
F-Score: 3/9
High Debt

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 32.0/100

Data gap 19/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

44/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 2.44, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · ROMER.OLLocal privado en este navegador · Romerike Sparebank
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$454M

P/E

2.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

9.1%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

2.44

↑
52-Week Range$160
$135$171

TradingView lightweight chart

ROMER.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $160.00Periodo +62.2%
Fair value: $160.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+73.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-89.0%

FCF / Net income

-1.94x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $494.1M · net income $226.1M · FCF $-439.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

45.8%+10.1% pts

FCF margin

-89.0%+451.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$494.1M$494.1M$469.5M$421.8M$94.8M
Net Income$226.1M$226.1M$192.1M$158.3M$33.8M
EPS79.7379.7367.7255.8111.93
Net Margin45.8%45.8%40.9%37.5%35.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity2.442.442.201.951.59
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-439.8M$-439.8M$-819.8M$-581.8M$-512.5M
Returns
ROE9.1%9.1%8.4%7.4%1.7%
Valuation
P/E2.102.101.902.1310.23
P/B0.180.180.160.160.17
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.3%5.3%11.3%344.8%—
EPS Growth17.7%17.7%21.3%368.0%—
Dividend Yield6.5%6.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-43.7%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$14.20

Spread vs growth

61.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-26.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$17.18

Spread vs growth

44.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-10.0%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$27.67

Spread vs growth

27.8%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +20.8%

Total return

+20.8%

Start / end P/E

2.1x → 2.0x

EPS bridge

67.72 → 79.73

Residual

-0.5%

EPS growth+17.7%
Multiple rerating-2.9%
Dividend+6.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.