Basic Materials / ChemicalsNYSE
$8.99
-0.16 (-1.75%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 34% · confianza 19%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $8.6M · quality 23.0/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
22/100
D
Piotroski
3/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$606M
P/E
N/A
•EV/EBITDA
9.5x
↓ROE
-133.5%
↓Gross Margin
8.1%
↓Debt/Equity
2.46
↑TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2012–2025 · 13 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
+2.3%
FCF CAGR
—
FCF margin
-6.3%
FCF / Net income
0.22x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $1.47B · net income $-422.5M · FCF $-91.7M
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $1.47B | $1.47B | $1.63B | $1.64B | $1.72B | $1.41B | $1.34B | $1.43B | $1.96B | $940.4M | $868.7M | $941.4M | $957.7M | $1.05B | $1.10B |
| Net Income | $-422.5M | $-422.5M | $-39.0M | $-101.8M | $-14.9M | $66.4M | $555000.00 | $-22.4M | $128.4M | $325.0M | $73.3M | $55.3M | $31.7M | $219.8M | $242.1M |
| EBITDA | $136.9M | $136.9M | $173.7M | $81.3M | $176.9M | $127.9M | $108.0M | $89.7M | $293.8M | $155.6M | $225.9M | $208.7M | $148.6M | $363.0M | $402.9M |
| EPS | -6.33 | -6.33 | -0.59 | -1.57 | -0.23 | 1.05 | 0.01 | -0.57 | 1.96 | 5.81 | 1.55 | 1.30 | 0.75 | 5.21 | 5.74 |
| Gross Margin | 8.1% | 8.1% | 10.2% | 5.4% | 7.2% | 5.3% | 4.7% | 3.7% | 14.9% | 15.0% | 20.9% | 21.5% | 23.4% | 31.8% | 34.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | 0.8% | 4.5% | 0.2% | 1.6% | -0.7% | -2.3% | -3.7% | 7.6% | 6.3% | 15.8% | 12.7% | 6.6% | 27.6% | 31.2% |
| Net Margin | -28.8% | -28.8% | -2.4% | -6.2% | -0.9% | 4.7% | 0.0% | -1.6% | 6.6% | 34.6% | 8.4% | 5.9% | 3.3% | 21.0% | 22.1% |
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 2.46 | 2.46 | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -50.16 | -15.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Current Ratio | 1.37 | 1.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | |||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $-91.7M | $-91.7M | $95.7M | $8.6M | $-69.4M | $138.0M | $61.2M | $-48.6M | $118.1M | $54.8M | $143.5M | $124.2M | $113.0M | $162.0M | $199.8M |
| Returns | |||||||||||||||
| ROE | -133.5% | -133.5% | -5.5% | -13.6% | -1.8% | 8.2% | 0.1% | -3.3% | 18.2% | 46.8% | 34.6% | -322.4% | -50.7% | 22.7% | 33.4% |
| Valuation | |||||||||||||||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.53 | 9.53 | 6.54 | 12.04 | 7.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 1.90 | 1.90 | 0.74 | 0.37 | 0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | -10.1% | -10.1% | -0.8% | -4.3% | — | 4.7% | -6.1% | -26.9% | 108.1% | 8.3% | -7.7% | -1.7% | -8.5% | -4.5% | — |
| EPS Growth | -972.9% | -972.9% | 62.4% | -582.6% | — | 10400.0% | 101.8% | -129.1% | -66.3% | 274.8% | 19.2% | 73.3% | -85.6% | -9.2% | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
+133.5%
Start / end P/E
n/dx → n/dx
EPS bridge
-0.59 → -6.33
Residual
+133.5%
EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.